The robot is designed so that you can "screw" it.
Is marrying a robot (with sexual capabilities) or an animal more socially unacceptable?
Romans 1:24-27.
It's unnatural, therefore perverted.
What do you do if you want to walk on the grass one evening and it says "no Dogs Allowed on the Grass", just leave your mate behind and keep walking.
But I guess if we evolved, such a sign would be showing prejudice toward our anscestors, would it not? Sounds like a lawsuit for atheists to me.
Il go for animal as being more socialy unaceptable….
Just because if you marry a robot …. ul be percioeved as a freak.
If you marry an animal your a freak…..into beastiality ( e.g a perv ) and ur "harming" a living creature so its a double dose of perversion.
Anyway just my thaughts on that 
They don't make sex robots yet.
So I would have to say it's more socially unacceptable to marry something which actually exists, but cannot consent to marriage.
It seems to me that "somebody" has a little problem inside his trousers which leads him to feel quite inadequate. I suggest laying off that strange herb you are sampling and socialize with real women.
Mr. M on "marrying…"
Both are acceptable (to me, at least).
Do whatever the **** you want so long as no one who does not wish to be hurt is hurt.
Well, not a robot anyways!
But an animal, yuk!
What's with all the "marrying inanimate objects" questions recently?
Both are pretty bad.
But you're a filthy robosexual!
These choices sound fine to me.
I mean they already do this in Japan.
Yes and no for 2 pts.
